In case you were wondering what the fuss was about, here is what she tweeted:
"Children in homosexual relationships are subject to emotional abuse. Legitimising gay marriage is like legalising child abuse''.
Headlines are designed to create attention and unfortunately many of the sensational headlines that included words like “gay slur” and “homophobic” distorted the truth of both what was said and my actual views.
Wendy- I did not read the sensational headlines, but your tweet is a gay slur, you may have committed a criminal offence, and is homophobic.
She then goes on to say, after saying that the form of the tweet was a mixup, but that she was ultimatelty responsible:
I hold no personal animosity against homosexuals. The way people choose to conduct their lives is up to them and I will defend the right of every Australian to live according to their personal beliefs as long as their choices do not infringe upon the rights and choices of other Australians or the nation as a whole....Well, actually, Wendy, here is a basic lesson. You are running for political office, in a democracy. Australia is one of the world's oldest democracies. People are entitled to be "pleased" with the candidates as they think fit and vote them in and out accordingly. Legislation ultimately in the words of Michael Kirby is the common sense of the nation. Ultimately the legislative process involves compromise, often on pleasing certain groups who want things their way, whether those groups are called the Liberal Party, ALP, Greens or Family First. That is particularly the case in the house of review- the Senate- to which you seek election.
I do not believe that upholding marriage or preventing children being raised in homosexual families is discrimination. We can’t govern Australia by legislation based on pleasing each group who wants things their way.
Showing her underlying beliefs, Wendy stated:
Having an opinion is not homophobic. Having an opinion is not discriminatory. Having an opinion is a part of democracy and by standing for the senate I am a part of the democratic process that gives every Queenslander the chance to agree with me or not.
I reach out to those within the homosexual community and ask them to understand the thoughts and feelings of the many Australians that believe as I do.
Finally, what is this rot about "upholding marriage"? Is the institution of marriage in such a parlous state that to allow homosexual couples to marry will destroy the institution of marriage for heterosexual couples?