For more than 10 years Manuel
Jose Bermudez, Jhon Alejandro Rodriguez and Alex Zabala maintained a
polyamorous relationship. Shortly before
Alex died, that three way polyamorous relationship became a four way
polyamorous relationship when another man, Victor Prada joined the
relationship.
When Alex Zabala died in 2014,
the question became who would become his survivor for the purposes of his
pension. Last week the Superior Court of
Medellin, in Colombia in what appears to be a world first, recognised Manuel
Bermudez and Jhon Rodriguez as the survivors.
The Court said
that the union between Manuel, Jhon and Alex was a “polyamorous relationship that has the components of permanence in
community, implies the coupling of an identity as a family that is based on the
common search for means of subsistence, and mutual company or a moral support.”
“From this perspective, the union constitutes a family
constitutionally protected modality, holder of the prerogatives, rights and
duties that the constitution and the law recognise to the family, as a
fundamental nucleus of society, and as beneficiaries of the pension of
survivors in charge of the general pension system,” the Court said.
Clarin.com reports
that Manuel said from his Facebook account:
“Survivors
pension is an acquired right. But above
all it is the recognition, the worthy memory, of those who love and loved us
for ten years of their lives. Thanks to
those who on the subject speak, think and decide injustice.”
The time that Victor Prada was
in the relationship was not enough that he would be considered to be a survivor
for the purposes of the pension.
Manuel, John and
Victor were in the news in 2017 for being the first marriage between three men
in Colombia. This was the decision that
they made in view of the problems they had concerning Alex’s entitlements with the
pension fund.
Just as in
Colombia, polyamorous relationships in Australia are on the rise. While not common, anecdotal reports indicate
that polyamorous relationships are becoming more common, particularly in the
LGBTI community. It is unlikely that the
same outcome would have occurred in Australia, given that there are no
constitutional protections for who constitutes a family. Careful estate planning would need to be
undertaken in such circumstances, to ensure that the survivors are able to
inherit.
The last words
belong to Manuel:
“At
first, people look with strangeness at a relationship like this, but as we are
open and respond openly, very quickly they go to the respect and understand
that we are a traditional family in many aspects, common and current, nothing
extraordinary happens here.”
No comments:
Post a Comment